|
All Just about DivorceTax Consequences of Antenuptial Agreements
by:
Jeffrey Broobin
It is essential that the parties entering into an agreement be advised of Tax Ramifications of property transfers ready-made consistent
to the agreement, and that the agreement be examined from time to time to be sure that the results are echoic in the current tax law.
Piece simply execution a antenuptial agreement normally does not result in any Immediate Tax Consequences, taxes will become an issue later upon divorce or death for all transfers ready-made prior to the marriage, during the marriage, and upon the surcease of the marriage.
Prior To and During Marriage
Since the issue in a antenuptial agreement is to remove property rights in exchange for release of matrimonial rights or against a will, the tax consequences will depend on once
the remove takes place. Generally, property transfers ready-made before the marriage may have adverse financial gain
and gift tax results, piece they will not incur gift tax or financial gain
tax if ready-made during the marriage. Therefore, the antenuptial agreement should stipulate that any remove of property occur after the wedding.
Prior to the enactment of Sec. 1041, the Supreme Court subordinate
that the transferer Recognized Gain for financial gain
tax purposes equal to the difference between the fair market value of the property transferred and its adjusted basis once
such property is transferred in exchange for the release of property rights. No financial gain
tax was recognized by the party who discharged the matrimonial rights, as several the IRS and the courts have control that for financial gain
tax purposes, the value of matrimonial rights is equal to the value of the property received. However, for estate and gift tax purposes, Matrimonial Rights are not considered full and adequate consideration, and consequently, the remove of property is treated as a gift (Sec. 2043(b); Reg. Sec. 25.2512-8).
Sec. 1041 was entered to override the court's decision to tax the gain on property transferred between spouses and former spouses once
the remove is ready-made incident to divorce. Transfers inside
six years after divorce that are consistent
to the terms of a divorce decree are deemed to be incident to divorce. A remove between Prospective Spouses, however, is still treated as a sale and the transferer will recognize gain if the value of the property exceeds his or her adjusted basis.
For example, a man and woman are Contemplating Marriage. She has substantial assets she wishes to protect in the event of divorce or death; therefore, she and her fiancée execute a antenuptial agreement that allows her to remove $250,000 to him in exchange for his release of all matrimonial claims against any of her property in the event of divorce or death. One month before the wedding, she transfers stock worth $250,000 to him. Since she had purchased the stock several years ago for $50,000, the remove of the stock causes her to have a assessable gain for financial gain
tax purposes of $200,000. In addition, she has ready-made a gift (subject to the gift tax rules) of $250,000 and his basis in the stock is $250,000.
If the Remove of The Stock had occurred after the wedding, then she would-be have not recognized gain on the transfer, as Sec. 1041(a) provides that property transfers between spouses do not result in recognition of gain or loss. Neither would-be she have been subject to gift tax because Sec. 2523(a) provides for an unlimited matrimonial deduction for gifts between spouses. Therefore, the antenuptial agreement should provide for property transfers to occur after the wedding.
If terms of the Antenuptial Agreement provide for a series of payments by one partner in return for the another spouse's release against the transferor's assets in the event of divorce or death, then no financial gain
or gift tax consequences result as long as the couple is wedded during the entire stream of payments. If the couple divorces before the last payment, remaining payments may constitute gifts ready-made outside marriage.
After Surcease of the Marriage
If the marriage ends in divorce, the antenuptial agreement often spells out the property rights and obligations of several parties. Property transfers between former spouses consistent
to a antenuptial agreement are classified as property settlements, alimony, or child support. Maintenance is assessable to the recipient and deductible by the payer, but property settlements and child keep are neither assessable to the recipient nor deductible by the payer.
Maintenance is objectively defined because the remunerator partner benefits from payments being classified as alimony, piece the recipient partner benefits from payments being classified as either Child Keep or a property settlement, for federal financial gain
tax purposes. All payments meeting the seven objective criteria are classified as maintenance payments, regardless of the parties' intent, even as if the payments do not satisfy the payer’s keep obligation under state law. Similarly, payments that do not meet the objective criteria for maintenance for tax purposes are not deductible to the payer, even as if such payments qualify as maintenance under state law or the parties intend for them to qualify as alimony.
Maintenance Payments
To be deductible for tax purposes, maintenance payments must meet the seven objective criteria provided in IRC Sec. 71. Payments that do not meet these criteria are recharacterized as either child keep or a property settlement. Consequently, if the parties will to have certain payments qualify as alimony, it is essential that the terms of the antenuptial agreement be structured so all criteria are satisfied. Each of the objective criteria is provided below.
1. Payments must be ready-made in cash.
2. Payments must be received by or on behalf of a partner under a divorce or separation instrument. Further, if the parties have entered into a antenuptial agreement providing for the Keep of Either Partner and, the divorce decree or written separation instrument refers to the antenuptial agreement for the determination of alimony, then the antenuptial agreement will be treated as consistent
to a divorce instrument.
3. The payer’s obligation to do payments must end with the death of the recipient spouse.
4. The instrument must not specifically designate that the payments are not alimony.
5. The filing of a joint tax return is prohibited.
6. In the case of lawfully separated spouses, the Payor and Recipient spouses must not be members of the same family at the time of the payment.
7. Payments cannot be fixed as child keep or treated as fixed as child support.
Keep each of the seven criteria in mind once
reviewing the tax consequences of the terms provided in a antenuptial agreement. Several of the common problems encountered causation maintenance payments to be classified as a property settlement for tax purposes are discussed below.
First, Non-Cash Spousal Keep payments ready-made consistent
to the terms of a antenuptial agreement, even as those that satisfy the payer’s obligation for maintenance under state law, are not deductible. The antenuptial agreement should specify that all maintenance is to be paid in cash.
Second, the terms of the antenuptial agreement should be structured so the remunerator partner has no obligation to do any payments after the recipient spouse's death. If such payments are allowable to occur, then none of the payments, even as those ready-made before the death of the recipient spouse, qualify as alimony.
For example, the husband is required to pay his married woman $20,000 per year for 15 years or until her death, whichever is earlier. The agreement besides provides that if she dies before the end of 15 years, he will pay her estate the difference between the $300,000 that she would-be have received over the 15 years, less the figure that she really received. The fact that he is required to do a lump sum payment to the estate upon her death suggests all payments are a substitute for a $300,000 lump sum payment. Consequently, none of the annual $20,000 payments qualify as alimony.
Once
the antenuptial agreement does not address this issue, state law determines whether the recipient partner has any continued
obligation to do payments. In most states, keep payments mechanically
cease upon the payee's death; however, it is possible for payments that were not classified as alimony, for state purposes, to have qualified as maintenance for federal financial gain
tax purposes. Such payments would-be not cease upon the payee's death and all payments, even as those ready-made before the payee's death, would-be be recharacterized as property settlements.To ensure that payments are characterised as maintenance for federal financial gain
tax purposes, the antenuptial agreement should contain a formal statement that the obligation to do payments terminates at the recipient spouse's death.
Third, if the parties will to treat cash payments as thing
another than alimony, the antenuptial agreement must state which payments the parties do not want treated as alimony. For federal financial gain
tax purposes, all payments that qualify as maintenance will be treated as such unless the payments are specifically selected
as child keep or a property settlement. It is a nice idea for the antenuptial agreement to contain a provision that allows the spouses to change the designation of those payments from non-alimony to maintenance in futurity years. This gives the parties several flexibility in case the circumstances of the parties change in Futurity Years.
Finally, the terms of the antenuptial agreement should be structured to avoid any language that could be construed as representing child support. If it is possible to determine, by reference to the antenuptial agreement, what portion of a payment was intended as child support, then that portion of the payment will be treated as child keep and only the remainder will be considered alimony. Payments are treated as child keep to the extent that they are subject to reduction on the happening of a contingency fixed in the instrument relating to the child; or at a time that can be clearly associated with a contingency related to the child.
Contingencies relating to a child include, but are not limited to, the child attaining a specific age or financial gain
level; the child marrying, dying, or gaining employment, and the child departure school or the spouse's family Reg. Sec. 1.71-1T(c), Q&A-17. A Payment Reduction associated with a contingency with respect to a child is a more much ambiguous standard and depends on an analysis of the facts and circumstances of the situation. See Reg. Sec. 1.71-1T(c), Q&A-18, for specific instances that are deemed to be associated with a contingency with respect to a child.
Example: Scott agrees to pay Debbie $2,000 per month until she dies. Debbie has custody of their child, Eric. The agreement states that upon Eric attaining the age of 16, the monthly payment will be reduced to $1,200. Of each $2,000 payment, $1,200 is maintenance and the remaining $800 is treated as child support.
Maintenance Recapture. Payments that would-be otherwise qualify as maintenance that decreases quickly in the 1st three years following separation or divorce, may be recharacterized as a property settlement. After the terms of the antenuptial agreement have been analyzed to determine which payments qualify as Maintenance for tax purposes, it is necessary to check whether the maintenance recapture provisions apply. Recapture does not apply to payments reduced due to death of either spouse; the marriage of the recipient partner wherever
payments cease under the terms of the divorce decree; temporary keep payments; or unsteady
payments from a pre- existing formula (e.g., percentage of gross financial gain
from a business), once
the formula is fixed under the terms of the divorce or separation instrument and is effective for at least three years.
If the recapture rules apply, then before sign language the antenuptial agreement the parties need to revise the terms of the agreement so payments are not subject to maintenance recapture. Payments recharacterized under the maintenance recapture rules become financial gain
to the payor partner and a deduction to the recipient spouse.
Maintenance Recapture, if applicable, occurs in the third post-separation year and is the sum of the excess payments ready-made in several the 1st and second post-separation years. The second-year excess payment is determined 1st and is calculated as the figure by which the second year's payment exceeds the third-year payment plus $15,000. The first- year excess payment is then calculated as being the figure by which the first-year payment exceeds the average of the adjusted payments from the second year and the payments from the third year, plus $15,000.
The recapture rules apply only to excess payments ready-made in the 1st three post-separation years. Consequently, payments ready-made after the third year may be reduced without recapture. Payments increasing from year to year do not trigger recapture.
Property Settlements
Once
the parties intend to use a antenuptial agreement to designate each spouse's property rights and obligations in the event of divorce and want to ensure that all transfers ready-made after divorce avoid several financial gain
and gift tax, the antenuptial agreement should include a provision that does all payments conditional on their being enclosed
as part of the divorce decree. Sec. 1041 provides that no gain or loss is recognized for financial gain
tax purposes on the remove of property incident to divorce and that such transfers are treated as gifts. In situations wherever
there is nonresident alien spouse, extreme caution is necessary as the benefits of Sec. 1041 are sharply curtailed Sec. 1041(d).
The code besides states that transfers occurring inside
one year after the surcease of marriage are deemed to be incident to divorce, and the regulations provide that transfers ready-made inside
six years after a divorce are deemed to be incident to divorce, only if the transfers are ready-made consistent
to the terms of the divorce or separation instrument Reg. Sec. 1.71-1T(b), Q&A-7.
Child Support. If the parties intend for certain payments to qualify as child support, rather than alimony, then the figure of the payment constituting child keep should be specifically declared in the terms of the agreement. In situations wherever
payments are reduced in violation of the terms of the agreement (i.e., the payor partner is delinquent), payments are 1st treated as child keep payments before any maintenance financial gain
is according by the recipient.14
Example: Under terms of the separation agreement, Jack is required to pay Lisa $1,000 per month, $600 of which is selected
in the agreement as keep for their minor child. If Jack only pays Lisa $9,000 during 1992, then $7,200 will be considered child keep and the remaining $1,800 will qualify as alimony.
In situations wherever
the antenuptial agreement requires a specific payment for several maintenance and child keep without individually stating the figure of each, the entire payment will be treated as alimony.
Example: Hal agrees to pay Wanda $600 per month until she dies. Wanda has Custody of Their Child, Chris. The agreement states that as long as Hal continues to do monthly payments to Wanda, he is alleviated of all keep obligations for Chris. Even as if Wanda can show that the entire figure was used to keep Chris, the entire $600 qualifies as maintenance since it cannot be determined from the agreement how more of each payment is for child support.
In the Event of Death
Once
a antenuptial agreement takes effect due to the death of a spouse, the property is enclosed
in the decedent's gross estate and the recipient partner takes a basis in the property equal to its fair market value Sec. 2043(b). As antecedently
discussed, most states give the living partner the right to elect against what was provided in the will and instead takes a set percentage of the deceased spouse's assets. This problem is eliminated once
the parties address the issue in an enforceable antenuptial agreement.
Example: Richard and Mollie are contemplating marriage. Richard, who was antecedently
married, has accumulated a appreciable figure of wealth that he wishes to leave to his children. Richard and Mollie enter into a antenuptial agreement wherein Mollie agrees to waive any claims against Richard's assets upon his death. In return, Richard agrees to transfer, at the time of his death, a percentage of his assets into trust with the financial gain
to go to Mollie for the remainder of her life and the property to go to his children Upon Her Death. The remainder of Richard's estate goes directly to his children. In the event of Richard's death, Mollie would-be be unable to elect against the will provisions and the fiduciary
of Richard's estate could elect to treat the trust as a QTIP trust, since the property in the trust is qualified impermanent interest property and Mollie is entitled to the financial gain
from the property for life. Thus, the estate would-be obtain a matrimonial deduction for the value of the trust assets Sec. 2056(b)(7).
Just about the author:
Jeffrey Broobin is a free-lance writer on family and finance issues; his main goal is to help folk during their complex
period of life.
Website: http://www.legalhelpmate.com
Email: jeffreyb@legalhelpmate.com
Circulated by Article Emporium
| |
